Opsware acquires CreekPath
Today, Opsware announced their acquisition of CreekPath. it complements an already comprehensive solution with storage management automation.
Creekpath's software has many of the necessary pieces for a strong application storage automation solution. It excels in discovering and mapping an organization's entire storage supply chain, from the database through file systems, volume managers, servers, fabric switches, array controllers and down to the disk drives. Creekpath's technology also excels in the breadth of storage technologies it addresses. Its proven ability to support the largest and most heterogeneous production storage networks make it an ideal choice for becoming part of the Opsware family of products, which already offer the industry's broadest support for automating heterogeneous data center environments.
It seems that their only missing piece would be around virtualization management.
Technorati Tags: CMDB, ITIL, datacenter automation
Re: Opsware acquires CreekPath
Opsware doesn't have virtualization and I wouldn't expect it to be on their roadmap. They do however have a pretty good partnership program with VMware, and will likely leverage that as well as other virtualization technologies (Solaris Zones, MS Virtual PC, and Xen) as they become more viable in the market.
Unless you're an OS maker that can tie the tech directly to the kernal, it would be pretty dumb at this point to compete with VMware who have a huge lead in the market and in mindshare. Actually, even if you are an OS maker it may not make much sense at this point.
Re: Opsware acquires CreekPath
Re: Opsware acquires CreekPath
Where I see the virtualization component becoming important is when users stop managing their applications from the bottom-up at the infrastructure level, and start managing them from the top-down at a service level. At that point, the ability to seemlessly move an app from server to server will require the abstraction layer that virtualization provides so a certain quality of service may be maintained.
IT architects and other bleeding edge folks like to talk about the application or service-level management now, but no one that I've seen is actually doing it yet. I think the reason, as you note, is that it requires an end-to-end automation system, and the virtualization component is a 'must have' so the hardware allocation isn't a game of comparing apples to oranges. Looks like Opsware is the closest to meeting the basic requirements, though EMC keeps making acquisitions that bring it closer as well. Should be interesting to see how it all plays out.
