<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Jean-Christophe Martin&#039;s blog - cmdb tag</title>
  <link>http://www.jcmartin.org/tags/cmdb/</link>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <copyright>Jean-Christophe Martin</copyright>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:18:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>Pebble (http://pebble.sourceforge.net)</generator>
  <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
  
  
  <item>
    <title>CA acquired Cendura in September</title>
    <link>http://www.jcmartin.org/2006/10/10/1160540187402.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          &lt;p&gt;
Last month, &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/092706-ca-cendura.html&#034;&gt;CA acquired Cendura&lt;/a&gt; to complement its CMDB offering. This comes after a string of consolidations
&lt;br /&gt;in the discovery space (see my previous post about &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.jcmartin.org/2006/06/16/1150500711674.html&#034;&gt;Applications and Asset discovery landscape&lt;/a&gt;).
&lt;br /&gt;It will be interesting to watch how CA integrates &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.cendura.com/&#034;&gt;Cendura&#039;s Cohesion&lt;/a&gt; with its own Sonar technology :
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;
Sonar watches and analyzes traffic on the network, and understands more than 1,700 protocols and information sources. It builds accurate maps and keeps those maps updated as resource allocations change.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Also, Cohesion is coming with an impressive set of rules that could be applied to ensure the compliance of configurations
&lt;br /&gt;with best practices. Integrating these rules on top of a CMDB could provide an interesting way of performing
&lt;br /&gt;configuration management (configuration audit) or even problem management (root cause analysis).
&lt;br /&gt;CA is expecting to integrate Cendura&#039;s technology within 120 days. Lets see.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- technorati tags start --&gt;&lt;p style=&#034;text-align:right;font-size:10px;&#034;&gt;Technorati Tags: &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.technorati.com/tag/CMDB&#034; rel=&#034;tag&#034;&gt;CMDB&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.technorati.com/tag/ITIL&#034; rel=&#034;tag&#034;&gt;ITIL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;!-- technorati tags end --&gt;
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>Datacenters</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.jcmartin.org/2006/10/10/1160540187402.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.jcmartin.org/2006/10/10/1160540187402.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:16:27 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>CMDB Reconciliation</title>
    <link>http://www.jcmartin.org/2006/06/28/1151540433927.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          &lt;p&gt;
In a post titled &#034;&lt;a href=&#034;http://blog.evergreensys.com/htsrv/trackback.php?tb_id=221&#034;&gt;Reconciliation: The Key to an Accurate CMDB&lt;/a&gt;&#034;  the author suggest that discovery and mapping tools are key to ensure the accuracy of a CMDB. However, this solves only one of the problems: how to ensure that the infrastructure state matches what is in the CMDB. The issue is that there is no way to know if what is discovered ought to be or is simply the result of out of band management.
&lt;br /&gt;The key to solve this issue is to drive the configuration and changes through the CMDB, by integrating the CMDB with change management, release management or configuration tools.
&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>ITIL</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.jcmartin.org/2006/06/28/1151540433927.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.jcmartin.org/2006/06/28/1151540433927.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:20:33 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>Application and Asset discovery landscape</title>
    <link>http://www.jcmartin.org/2006/06/16/1150500711674.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          &lt;p&gt;
With the &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.jcmartin.org/2006/06/07/1149709532646.html&#034;&gt;recent acquisition of nLayers by EMC&lt;/a&gt;, it is the right time to look back at the landscape after this wave of consolidation :
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;EMC acquired nLayers, and their Insight product&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Symantec acquired Relicore and their Clarity product&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Eracent has its EnterpriseAM product&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;BMC has BMC Foundation Discovery with technology coming from Network Associates&#039; Magic, and Marimba&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Tideway with its Foundation product&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;IBM acquired Collation and its Confignia product&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Mercury acquired Appilog&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Cendura has Cohesion&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;CA with its Sonar product &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;HP with its acquisition of Peregrine&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;
There are still some independent companies, and options for consolidation.
&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <category>Datacenters</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.jcmartin.org/2006/06/16/1150500711674.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.jcmartin.org/2006/06/16/1150500711674.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 23:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>
